Talent Management Strategy: Why Organisation Design Comes First
Talent management, organisation design and organisational development (OD) are often run as separate pieces of work. They work far better together. Capability, roles, structure and opportunity need to be considered as one system.
Most organisations have invested in talent at some point: a leadership programme, a succession plan, a new performance framework. Many find the results harder to sustain than they hoped. Often the people were not the problem. The roles they were asked to fill, the structure around them, or the lack of a real route forward meant that good talent had nowhere to go.
That is the case this article makes: before asking "do we have the right people?", it helps to ask "have we designed the right roles and structure for them to succeed in?"
What is talent management?
Talent management is how an organisation attracts, develops, deploys and keeps the people it needs to deliver its purpose, now and in the future. It covers recruitment, development, performance, succession and retention, but it is more than a list of HR processes. At its best, it is a set of deliberate choices about which capabilities matter most and how the organisation will grow them.
Is talent management the same as HR?
No, although they overlap. HR is a function that looks after the whole employment relationship, from contracts and pay to policy and employee relations. Talent management is a strategic focus within that, and it belongs as much to leaders as to HR. A line manager deciding who to stretch with a new project is doing talent management just as much as an HR team designing a succession process.
How does talent management relate to organisation design and OD?
The three are closely linked but answer different questions:
- Organisation design asks: what structure, roles, accountabilities and ways of working does the organisation need to deliver its strategy?
- Organisational development (OD) asks: how do we build the culture, relationships and capability for change to take hold and last?
- Talent management asks: do we have, and are we growing, the people to fill those roles and lead that change?
When talent work runs ahead of design, people are developed for roles that do not exist, or placed into roles that cannot succeed. When design runs ahead of talent and OD, a new structure looks right on paper but nobody is ready to work in it. Considering them together is where the real gains tend to come from.
Why should organisation design come first?
Because roles are the bridge between strategy and people. If a role is unclear, overloaded or poorly connected to the roles around it, even very capable people will struggle in it, and the organisation may wrongly conclude it has a talent problem. Getting the design right first gives talent decisions something solid to aim at.
The Labyrinth way of thinking: Capability, Roles, Structure, Opportunity
At Labyrinth we find it useful to look at four things together. This is our way of thinking about the work, not an established industry model, and we use it as a set of questions rather than a fixed method.
- Capability – What skills, knowledge and behaviours does the strategy genuinely require, and which do we already have?
- Roles – Are roles designed around that work, with clear purpose, accountability and a manageable scope?
- Structure – Do reporting lines, teams and decision rights help people collaborate, or get in their way?
- Opportunity – Can people see a real route to grow, move and contribute more, and is that route open fairly?
If one of the four is weak, investment in the others tends to leak away. A strong development programme (capability) disappoints if there are no roles to grow into (opportunity). A clean new structure stalls if the capability to work in it has not been built.
You can read more about how we approach this on our How we work page.
What does a talent management strategy look like in practice?
A talent management strategy sets out which capabilities matter most, where the organisation will build them, buy them or borrow them, and how it will know whether it is working. The examples below are general illustrations of the kinds of choices organisations face. They are not client stories.
Example 1: Redesigning roles before recruiting
A growing organisation keeps losing new managers within a year. Rather than changing the recruitment process again, it looks at the role itself and finds it combines two very different jobs. Splitting the role and clarifying accountabilities comes before any new hiring.
Example 2: Linking succession to future structure
A leadership team builds a succession plan for today's senior roles, then realises the strategy will reshape several of those roles within three years. It shifts the plan to focus on the capabilities the future roles will need, not the job titles of today.
Example 3: Opening up internal moves
An organisation with good development programmes still sees people leave for progression. It reviews how internal vacancies are shared and how managers support moves, so that opportunity matches the capability it has invested in.
Example 4: Developing leaders alongside a restructure
During a restructure, an organisation pairs the design work with coaching and development for the leaders who will run the new teams, so the new structure has people ready to make it work from the start.
How does workforce planning fit in?
Strategic workforce planning is where talent management and organisation design meet in the numbers. It asks what work the organisation will need doing over the next few years, what roles and skills that implies, and how far today's workforce is from that picture.
A practical approach usually covers:
- Demand – the work and capabilities the strategy will require, and how that is likely to change.
- Supply – the people and skills you have now, including likely turnover and retirements.
- Gaps – where shortfalls or surpluses are likely to appear, and how serious they are.
- Actions – whether to build (develop), buy (recruit), borrow (contract or partner) or redesign the work itself.
That last option is often overlooked. Sometimes the best answer to a skills gap is not a new hire but a role or process designed differently, which is why workforce planning works best with organisation design at the table.
How will AI change roles and talent management?
AI is already changing the tasks inside many roles: some work is automated, some is supported, and new work appears around overseeing and improving these tools. That makes role design more important, not less. Organisations will need to decide which tasks people should keep, how roles are reshaped, and which capabilities, such as judgement, relationships and working well with AI tools, become more valuable.
For talent management, this means planning for skills that are still emerging and helping people move into reshaped roles with confidence. For OD, it means paying attention to trust, culture and how change is experienced. We explore this further in our article on organisational design and AI.
Frequently asked questions
What is talent management?
Talent management is how an organisation attracts, develops, deploys and keeps the people it needs to deliver its strategy, now and in the future. It includes recruitment, development, performance, succession and retention, guided by clear choices about which capabilities matter most.
Is talent management the same as HR?
No. HR is a function covering the whole employment relationship, including contracts, pay, policy and employee relations. Talent management is a strategic focus within that, shared between HR and leaders, on building and keeping the capability the organisation needs.
What is the difference between talent management and organisational development?
Talent management focuses on people: having and growing the right capability for key roles. Organisational development focuses on the organisation as a whole: culture, relationships and the capacity to change. They work best when planned together.
Why should organisation design come before talent management?
Roles connect strategy to people. If roles and structure are unclear or overloaded, capable people struggle, and the issue can be mistaken for a talent problem. Designing the roles first gives talent decisions a clear target.
What is strategic workforce planning?
Strategic workforce planning looks at the work an organisation will need done in the coming years, the roles and skills that implies, and the gap from today's workforce. It then sets out whether to build, buy, borrow or redesign work to close that gap.
How is AI affecting talent management?
AI is changing the tasks within many roles. That makes it important to redesign roles deliberately, plan for emerging skills and support people through change, rather than treating AI as a technology project alone.
About this article
This article is part of Beneath the Surface, Labyrinth's web-first publication. It develops a question first raised through Labyrinth's social thinking and remains available in full without an email gate.
If you are weighing up talent, structure and change in your own organisation, we would be glad to talk it through. See our approach.
Continue exploring: Read Beneath the Surface · Explore related areas of work · See our approach